We must not excuse whoever, whatever harm Bitcoin. Even if they are Blockstream, Max keiser, Samson Mow, Adam Back or Satoshi Nakamoto.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Tether can't harm Bitcoin

If tether goes away, you'll have some other stablecoin

Amigo, sorry to tell you... But you're no #Bitcoin Maxi.

Are you the self-anointed maxi gatekeeper?

Why do you take so much pride in a term a shitcoin scammer came up with?

I am just a pleb, who orange pilled a president, who made BTC legal tender. You can do whatever you want, yet, by definition USDT is still a shitcoin.

You think Bitcoin requires presidential approval?

You're just LARPing, oblivious to the nuances of life in the real world. USDT may be a shitcoin, it's a promissory note of a shitcoin but there is demand for access to that shitcoin, just as there's demand for Bitcoin for many different reasons.

Read my posts, I've said plenty of time that:

#Bitcoin doesn't need kings, or presidents, nor self appointed fairy godfathers or self appointed fairy godmothers...

#Bitcoin needs:

Builders

Makers

Doers

Back to the basics. What's the problem of the dollar and how Bitcoin fixes it.

USD is slavery. USDt is also slavery.

Tether claims to help people in countries that lack financial infrastructure, but that's exactly what Bitcoin will do. Tether makes people blind and clouding the essence. Tether is one of Bitcoin's biggest enemies.

I'm not talking about pegging.

Multi-currency makes friction.

We don't need any fiat-pegged-coin. We don't need any altcoin. If so, we should make it not.

You don't but stable fiat value balance without a bank account is useful to people who are not ready to stomach short term volatility

They also don't. They need right knowledge not fiat-pegged-coins.

Your words and your nickname are in conflict. You are advocating slavery.

Fiat = Slavery

Tether = Fiat....