I guess these sites rely on their readers being dumb as dog shit and not actually reading the documents they link to.

Their 'informant' with all of the 'evidence' must be a leprechaun because he doesn't exist in reality.

"The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of confidential informant records pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b}(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), and (b}{7)(F) [5 U.S.C.§ § 552 (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), and

(b)(7)(F)] and Privacy Act exemption 0)(2) [5 U.S.C.§ 552a 0)(2)]. "