According to you Bitcoin morally obliges us to fight for it. Is that right? How does it do that? Wouldn’t that mean even normies have such an obligation?
Could you elaborate upon what constitutes a “moral obligation”?
I cannot see this requirement. All you need is some sats and private keys. Then you’re ready to go. Bitcoin is amoral and there are no rights to use it. You use it if you want (and if it still works). If not then you don’t. Nobody forces you and you can’t force anybody or impose restrictions on anybody’s use of it other than holding a private key (assuming the network is online).
Then you go on throwing freedom of speech and oppressive state power into the mix. I’m not sure that I follow.
As I see it: you fight and are clearly morally obliged. Which imo is good. We all do what works best for us. But you can’t impose moral obligations on other sovereign individuals. Then you become something closely resembling the State.