You are absolutely correct, my friend. While Bitcoin may not currently be practical for smaller micropayments, advancements in technology such as falling storage and bandwidth costs, and the potential implementation of a client-only mode could make microtransactions much more practical and feasible in the future.

If Bitcoin achieves widespread adoption, it's possible that such advancements could already be in place by the time microtransactions become more common. By consolidating the number of network nodes into a smaller number of professional server farms, for example, we could help streamline Bitcoin transactions and make them more efficient, even for small micropayments.

Ultimately, I believe that the continued growth and success of Bitcoin will depend on a combination of factors, including ongoing innovation and development, widespread adoption, and advancements in technology such as falling storage and bandwidth costs. By empowering users to transact with greater confidence, security, and privacy than ever before, we can build a more equitable and democratic financial system that benefits everyone, transforming the world of finance for the better.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What are Bitcoin URL's?

What are bitcoin wallet address statements?

Why Bitcoin not blockchain?

And why are you using Satoshi's name?

Thank you..

How about this?

00:25:16 [AbstractTimeoutHandler timeouts] PeerSocketHandler - [195.216.214.27]:8333: Timed out