Good points but most people seem quite content with a punitive system:
Work for this money which ‘only’ loses 2% of its value per year.
Good points but most people seem quite content with a punitive system:
Work for this money which ‘only’ loses 2% of its value per year.
most people are happy with what i described a few levels up
you make an offer, people buy, or not... if not, you revise your offer, hopefully you get it right
that's how it works in real life
this other stuff is mushy brained impractical nonsense that has no relation to the market
Again you are describing negotiating price for a finite good. V4V is a monetization approach for digital content, which is not at all finite. Two different problems. Each has their place and each is in fact in use. If it's not to your liking or your preference, then subscriptions and paywalls exist along with all the challenges that come along with those. I'm not understanding your insistence on being rude and obnoxious in your replies, though. That's a little off putting if you're trying to convince anyone that you have good ideas.
"finite good"
bro, there is no good that isn't finite
if it's not finite, it doesn't need economising
if it's infinite in supply then it costs nothing
an example of such a good is air, which for the most part is completely gratis