Good points but most people seem quite content with a punitive system:

Work for this money which ‘only’ loses 2% of its value per year.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

most people are happy with what i described a few levels up

you make an offer, people buy, or not... if not, you revise your offer, hopefully you get it right

that's how it works in real life

this other stuff is mushy brained impractical nonsense that has no relation to the market

Again you are describing negotiating price for a finite good. V4V is a monetization approach for digital content, which is not at all finite. Two different problems. Each has their place and each is in fact in use. If it's not to your liking or your preference, then subscriptions and paywalls exist along with all the challenges that come along with those. I'm not understanding your insistence on being rude and obnoxious in your replies, though. That's a little off putting if you're trying to convince anyone that you have good ideas.

"finite good"

bro, there is no good that isn't finite

if it's not finite, it doesn't need economising

if it's infinite in supply then it costs nothing

an example of such a good is air, which for the most part is completely gratis

That's because V4V is more of an ongoing relationship than a one time exchange.

v4v sounds like a cult