No, actually…

I point out that he has a myopic view by only considering the impact on CPU cycles and memory usage when the risks are far broader.

I point out that he says he doesn’t care because there are already things bad people can do so he doesn’t worry about adding more.

I point out his dangerous design philosophy is suitable for a low risk startup and not for the system that manages the world’s money and our hope for the future.

Didn’t get those points? Maybe I used too many big words. Next time I’ll consider doing a comic strip or meme series.