Thank you, and likewise. It is a pleasure talking with you.
Oh, wow. You're way deeper into studying tarot than me. I'm very new to it.
I have a few sources for tarot and all are generally perennialist teachings in some form.
In The Law of One, they cover tarot quite a bit. I'll leave a link to the search results of the Law of One material for the word "tarot" but you can probably find some more hits if you search for "key", "card", "archetype", etc. using the integrated search engine on the site:
https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=tarot
76.6 Questioner: Sorry we have had such a long delay between the last session and this one. It couldn’t be helped I guess. Could you please tell me the origin of the tarot?
Ra: I am Ra. The origin of this system of study and divination is twofold: firstly, there is that influence which, coming in a distorted fashion from those who were priests attempting to teach the Law of One in Egypt, gave form to the understanding, if you will pardon the misnomer, which they had received. These forms were then made a regular portion of the learn/teachings of an initiate. The second influence is that of those entities in the lands you call Ur, Chaldea, and Mesopotamia who, from old, had received the, shall we say, data for which they called having to do with the heavens. Thusly we find two methods of divination being melded into one with uneven results; the, as you call it, astrology and the form being combined to suggest what you might call the correspondences which are typical of the distortions you may see as attempts to view archetypes.
According to Ra, the tarot was received by inspired Egyptian priests. It seems that the Ur/Chalea/Mesopotamian influence became somewhat distorted, merging astrology with tarot. Astrology and tarot both are valid but blending them likely leads to some confusion and inaccuracy.
Kabbalah Unveiled by Imre Vallyon is my other main tarot source. 200/350 pages of that book are about tarot cards. I don't agree with 100% of what he has in that book but unlike the Law of One, this book is structured like a textbook. Like the Law of One, it acknowledges the, at least partial, legitimacy of many religious traditions.