It’s helpful to make #Bitcoin mining more profitable, but it isn’t necessary. Only the most efficient and well equipped miners will make it in the long run.

The forces that keep #BTC mining decentralized extend beyond the network and attaches itself to energy availability in the real world.

#Bitcoin doesn’t just incentivize finding cheap and abundant energy, it incentivizes the world to produce MORE cheap and abundant energy. The degree to which we have already seen this is minimal, I expect its effect to be exponentially correlated with mass adoption.

The future I’m stacking for is one where instead of turning the money printer on in times of crisis (or clarity); we turn UP our energy production through whatever means necessary.

What would YOU rather give your children: more debt or more energy?

Does more energy mean more pollution for the environment?

Not in #Bitcoin’s case. While #BTC won’t turn down energy because of its means of production. When it comes to which type of energy #Bitcoin incentivizes, it’s cost effective energy. Dirty energy isn’t cost effective, but clean energy is.

FUD against #Bitcoin mining and its energy consumption is FUD against a sustainable future, and ignorance is not a valid excuse when it comes to OUR future.

Believe it or not an unsustainable future is no future at all.

It’s is #Bitcoin or die. Don’t be mistaken.

Will an empire on a #Bitcoin standard fall like its fiat predecessors? It’s possible we will never know. 😉

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.