That is NOT what I said.
try responding to what I actually DID say,
rather than making something up and talking about that instead.
That is NOT what I said.
try responding to what I actually DID say,
rather than making something up and talking about that instead.
> he posits the BEST self sovereign non-custodial LN usage, against the WORST monero usage
This seems equivalent to the point I argued against:
> he doesn't think using lightning in a privacy preserving manner is practical, and he thinks using monero in a privacy preserving manner is
The "BEST" self-sovereign non-custodial LN usage seems equivalent to what I describe as "using lightning in a privacy preserving manner"
What you describe as "the WORST monero usage" seems equivalent what I contrast with "using monero in a privacy preserving manner"
It seems to me, based on your own words, that you think the former is impractical and the latter is practical
But I disagree for the reasons provided above
I said nothing about the practicality of implementation.
but I got it 👍
you're guessing equivalency between stuff I said
and stuff you think.
if you want we can (again) have a actual discussion about the user experience of running a LN node vs running a monero node.
or a comparison of the UX of sending $1000 worth of sats through LN
or through monero