That is NOT what I said.

try responding to what I actually DID say,

rather than making something up and talking about that instead.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> he posits the BEST self sovereign non-custodial LN usage, against the WORST monero usage

This seems equivalent to the point I argued against:

> he doesn't think using lightning in a privacy preserving manner is practical, and he thinks using monero in a privacy preserving manner is

The "BEST" self-sovereign non-custodial LN usage seems equivalent to what I describe as "using lightning in a privacy preserving manner"

What you describe as "the WORST monero usage" seems equivalent what I contrast with "using monero in a privacy preserving manner"

It seems to me, based on your own words, that you think the former is impractical and the latter is practical

But I disagree for the reasons provided above

I said nothing about the practicality of implementation.

but I got it 👍

you're guessing equivalency between stuff I said

and stuff you think.

if you want we can (again) have a actual discussion about the user experience of running a LN node vs running a monero node.

or a comparison of the UX of sending $1000 worth of sats through LN

or through monero