understood, taxation would be required though... you could always change clients.
you also do this now with anything you buy on google/apple. They get 30% of any purchase (software, subscription, etc) that happens through their app store
Discussion
I would understand a client charging an upfront or subscription fee. I am then able to choose wether or not to use them.
Taking a cut of a zap that I send to another user will not be tolerated tho. I’d rather not use Nostr altogether in that case.
Just because Apple or Google does something doesn’t mean it’s fine to adopt it.
Not a dev but ain’t that the whole point here?
opt in model would fix this.. maybe a toggle under the bitcoin lightning address slot with 'allow 5% to be deducted of all zaps to support clientname' '
