Are there any proposed solutions for the bloat of the UTXO set? If spammers attempt to make a UTXO un-spendable with a false receiver address but otherwise follow TX consensus rules, is there a way to stop it? Thanks and love & support what you do!
Discussion
Nobody answers this, they just ignore the question.
I believe that Luke has a solution, but people won’t listen because of ego.
Ok, thanks. I’ll be on the lookout for it.
Luke not only had 1 solution to the problem, it looks like he coded 3 solutions. Also had more options.
Thanks KC. That was a long thread to get through and can’t say I understand much of the programming details but still good background info.
I found some of the counterpoints to be false arguments: Non Sequitors, Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, etc. which leaves Luke’s proposal still strongly logical and justified without strong counter arguments.
That makes 2 of us Delta Mike. I don’t wear the developer hat so I only understand it on the surface level. It sounds like Luke has a few answers that no-one is talking about so it must be political.