I don't think there is a logic relationship between your sentences, but I will just follow what you're saying.

But what happens if users don't have a monitor with higher brightness and contrast? How many people in the world have such a monitor?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

quantity over quality. not everybody matters.

IOW why do you care about the experience of a person who doesn't care about his own experience ?

if they don't have a good monitor it means they don't care how things look.

worry about people who care enough to upgrade their monitor.

i make more comments on this subject than a million people with dim monitors combined. they are irrelevant.

you

if their monitor is so dim and pale that they can't read the text it will be a good clue for them to get a new one.

Most people are on phones, not monitors

phones have incredible brightness and contrast when used indoors.

a separate mode is in order for outdoor use.

Why not both 🤷🏻‍♂️

So your solution is to change people to fit your ideal society, like Karl Marx?

Karl Marx is winning - isn't he ?

we are supposed to advance technology not retard it.

jokes aside the right way to do it is to have controls as follows:

1 - choose screen type - edge lit / FALD / miniled / OLED

2 - choose ambient brightness level - sunlight / daylight / office lighting / residential light / dim room / complete darkness

3 - HDR - yes / no

3 - vision acuity - normal / astigmatism etc.

my grandma for example didn't like dark mode but she was almost blind. i let her have bright mode even though i found it revolting myself.

i think people with astigmatism can't use dark mode for example.

I'll settle for a compromise.

I have astigmatism and use dark mode, never considered that fact

stop worrying about freeloaders. if somebody uses a monitor they found on the garbage they don't deserve to see anything.

most people are beyond help. stop trying to help them.