I don't think there is a logic relationship between your sentences, but I will just follow what you're saying.
But what happens if users don't have a monitor with higher brightness and contrast? How many people in the world have such a monitor?
I don't think there is a logic relationship between your sentences, but I will just follow what you're saying.
But what happens if users don't have a monitor with higher brightness and contrast? How many people in the world have such a monitor?
quantity over quality. not everybody matters.
IOW why do you care about the experience of a person who doesn't care about his own experience ?
if they don't have a good monitor it means they don't care how things look.
worry about people who care enough to upgrade their monitor.
i make more comments on this subject than a million people with dim monitors combined. they are irrelevant.
you
if their monitor is so dim and pale that they can't read the text it will be a good clue for them to get a new one.
So your solution is to change people to fit your ideal society, like Karl Marx?
Karl Marx is winning - isn't he ?
we are supposed to advance technology not retard it.
jokes aside the right way to do it is to have controls as follows:
1 - choose screen type - edge lit / FALD / miniled / OLED
2 - choose ambient brightness level - sunlight / daylight / office lighting / residential light / dim room / complete darkness
3 - HDR - yes / no
3 - vision acuity - normal / astigmatism etc.
my grandma for example didn't like dark mode but she was almost blind. i let her have bright mode even though i found it revolting myself.
i think people with astigmatism can't use dark mode for example.
stop worrying about freeloaders. if somebody uses a monitor they found on the garbage they don't deserve to see anything.
most people are beyond help. stop trying to help them.