I mean, people can propose anything they want and push to get it adopted. That’s what the bip-177 people are trying. But sats is already the standard that emerged organically and has been used for more than a decade, adopted widely by wallets, exchanges, educators, etc. Silly to try and eradicate that terminology.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sure, and I’m pretty sure wallets will adopt it for the simple reason that ₿ is much more recognizable than “sats”.

No one outside of the small Bitcoin bubble knows wtf sats are.