Right, and I chose to reply to the post that didn't say anything about making a new religion therefore making a new religion wasn't a part of our conversation. It was a part of the conversation you had prior to my choice to jump in, so it's not relevant to our portion of the conversation.

All religions are pointing at the same truths. Egotistical dogmatists, like yourself, who are too prideful and lazy to go study all of the traditions and/or are too unloving to actually abide the Golden Rule prefer to state that all religions are not pointing at the same truths as a coping mechanism. It's much easier to just say things from a position of willful ignorance than it is to go do your due diligence. You're too ignorant for this conversation.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You can also just answer the harmless clarifying question without being an asshole and creating a pointless argument for no reason.

I’m not interested in wasting my time studying countless unprovable and unverifiable myths that defy logic and laws of nature. Also, there are clear “truths” that contradict each other in the most common religions. Like the fact that Muslims believe god having a son is a ticket straight to hell and Christians believing that you can’t enter heaven without affirming that Jesus is a deity. Let’s not forget that countless religions were polytheistic and some religions don’t even believe in a heaven/hell but instead believe in reincarnation. You’re full of shit and just trying to find ways to cope with the fact that people you love and care about will go to hell for not believing in your religion.

Pray harder until your brain hallucinates some spiritual and subjective experience that comforts your fears of death and the unknown.