"for the sender" and "when used properly" is doing all the work in that post.

and you're still not private from your routing node.

not to mention the exploit that was just published.

fact is, LN has not been tested in an adversarial environment yet.

you're the shill who can't think critically about the tools you use.

this is just stock "my node doesnt discriminate therefore its fungible" maxi cope

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Don't put words into my mouth, shirtcoin shill.

I just said if I use #Bitcoin LN correctly, my sent txs are private. Your cope with this statement is unbelievable.

You used three notes, hundreds of words, yet did not explain what I've asked for.

Can you link to the "exploit"?

Centralized LSP user asserts his transactions are uncensorable

and in other retarded takes

https://tftc.io/lightning-bugs-and-regulatory-attacks-on-bitcoin/

So you still can't explain how you can censor my LN transaction, can't link to the "exploit" you mentioned. Like the true shirtcoin shill you are. Keep attacking #Bitcoin like a little retard, keep helping the fiat side. I honestly don't care. Your shirtcoin with a temporary privacy feature won't be the new #Bitcoin anyway.

You're correct, everybody with a brain knows the #LightningNetwork is still being developed and it's far from the final product. If there's a bug, it'll get fixed. Now go ahead and read about the upcoming hardfork your leaders decided to set for you. Goodbye shill 🤙💜