This is the same play everywhere across the western sphere: have some fuzzy idea of "hate" that is ill-defined, and then you can move the goalposts whenever you want to shut down free expression.
⚡️🇺🇸 WATCH - Bondi: “There's free speech and then there's hate speech … We will absolutely go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
https://blossom.primal.net/3c5852e5c12d6749c5d5f6f4f4237428d00423dc4db114f57840a9b773eb4d30.mp4
Discussion
Which only occurs in free (current empire & friends) countries and lots of cheap money to fund vague causes (antifa, blm, dei, etc.) Influencing/disturbing public opinion.
In most other countries around the world there is no need to define and redefine hate, its pretty clear what is means.
It's the actions taken, not the conversations describing actual issues (that people could use to actually resolve issues through proper conversation)
Banning conversations concerning certain subjects is setting the public up to fight eachother because of the deliberately caused unresolved misunderstandings...