I firmly believe the stuff about radio waves disrupting the endocrine clocks though.

That's why I connect my laptop via ethernet cables and the phone is over 10 metres away, and why I am pissed that I didn't keep my wired dual driver speakers instead of these ultra annoying bluetooth units, that constantly flip stereo channels and I have to remove and re-pair every time I change to windows to play games.

When I was young, I always thought the communications technologies of the future worked with photons and entanglement. But here we are, millimetre waves everywhere, some of them ionising oxygen in our blood. (20ghz, used in 5G).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yep the science on the biological harm is overwhelming. Just shadow band, or suppressed.

Congress passed a law that make it illegal to regulate telecom tech on the basis of health.

I include RF in the definition of “light”.

Invisibly Rainbow is a good book on the subject

*Invisible Rainbow

I think that due to wavelength, it is impossible to easily produce antennae that receive "photons" but fundamentally you are correct. Photons are just electrons with shorter wavelengths, that interact only with nanometre sized objects, mainly molecules.

This also means that there should be a way to catch the joules from either and convert them to electricity and vice versa. Look at quantum dots. These are just tiny little bits of metal that catch and sling back specific wavelengths by their shape and the electrostatic lensing effect. Not only that, but I remember reading about other experiments that showed that you can construct nanoparticles out of one material, at the right size, they behave like another material, for example, I think they made aluminium nanoclusters behave like gold.

This is the kind of facts that make me quite certain that all matter, both radiation particles and matter particles, are only different in their number of monents of rotation. Radiative particles have 1 or 2 axes of spin, where matter has 3. The 3 way spin orbits itself, whereas the 1 and 2 way spins are passive along one axis. And that leads me to the key element of my physics hypothesis: that the SPACE is made of an incompressible, inert, constantly dividing substance, and that photon/electron particles are like surfers riding the wave of expansion, and that what we call light speed is actually that expansion pattern, and further, that these electron/photon particles are constantly orbiting, most of them paired, and undetectable due to their almost perfectly balanced charges, but regardless, push matter towards the mass centre via an effect similar to surface tension, an invisible cloud around matter that optimises to a sphere when two such clouds start to merge.

And that also means that if you can direct electrons to resonate at maximum frequency/minimum wavelength, they behave like balanced atomic particles, but are in constant motion, probably due to having 4 rotational vectors, and with this you can control the direction of the space expansion, ie, zero out your mass and travel at the speed of light. Teleportation is then just about capturing the waveform of an object and causing it to be carried across a singular thread of these fundamental space particles, with precisely the right "punch" that it appears instantaneously in a new position.

I'm sure that I'm going to be vindicated in this model. It's far simpler than the mainstream physics theories, it's pure relativistic, and still enables zero time of travel quantum effects via the incompressibility of space.