It’s not an attack
Discussion
If some people claim “we broke it” I’d considere it an “attack”, otherwise they wouldn’t be claiming “victory”
They didn’t break anything though.
Bitcoiners whining that it broke are wrong too. Fees went up and you don’t get quick cheap txs anymore. That isn’t bitcoin breaking.
That’s exactly what I said 2 days ago
On that we are on the same page. The fees were high as hell too in the 69K bullrun. But this high fee market was planned, so it was an attack (from my point of view)
Either way, it’s up to interpretation
nostr:note1cstyrqkfe8plwa7uhxynl06qfhdw8usdvv6ht85shtskjwtlad3snz9fu4
“High prices were planned by buyers” is not an attack in any other industry. Why is it different in bitcoin?
If you try to “destroy” something it’s an attack, again. This is my point of view, it’s ok if you don’t agree
