This AI response you pasted (sorry, it shows), is weak. I define ownership widely, not narrowly because I include a wide set of dispositions, not just those which suit NFT peddlers.

Look realistically, you have a token but the ownership of the content is determined by your relation to it. Just holding a private key doesn't mean you can do anything with it. Enforcement is in real world. Say you want to print a tshirt with an NFT I sold you a license to just view on a marketplace. Yeah, you own a receipt for having made a payment and can transfer it. I still can go sue you for breach.

Clearly there is something missing to having full ownership.

Anyway, the babble about rights is a distraction.

What's key to my opinion is the cryptopunk esthetic has scammy connotations and I'm surprised you went for it.