Replying to Avatar ExponentialApe

I often think we define consciousness too narrowly. Perhaps it’s really as simple as preferring one state of reality over another. It could be possible that we need a Copernican shift in how we view consciousness itself. Maybe it’s more like decentralized, nested and firewalled networks. What if being ungrateful or “evil” is really a network connection issue, not being able to connect to enough nodes. This more broad definition would also mean an atom wanting another electron could be viewed as simple form consciousness and a human being wanting a healthy family could be viewed as a more complex form consciousness, however that same atom wanting an extra electron could be part of the network of relationships that give rise to human consciousness that wants a healthy family.

Avatar
Primate 2h ago

And health may be as simple as seeking a balanced state … with all the Maya just obfuscating the path of higher order worries and plans. Maybe atomic trajectory is how atoms worry about and plan to reach a steady state.

Who knows—photons apparently travel in as many as 37 dimensions.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.