He claims Hegel is full of ideobabble as he puts it, but then proceeds to translate it as it were , implying that it does infact have meaning , it's just obfuscated.
Why do you think that is?
Discussion
As James Lindsay loves to say, the communists share your vocabulary but not your dictionary
Who is James Lindsay?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair
Basically classical liberal who spends his time studying Marxist claptrap and trying to expose it
Well the meanings are contradictory, and they also illustrate a very bad way of attempting to get to the truth, or transcendence, or whatever. So it DOES have elements of useful concepts or words, for sure. But when contextualized in the whole theory, it is a pseudoscientific gobbledygook and a flat rejection of logic and reality.