nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk
The truth of the thing itself is independent of who says it. Nothing you've said in this post rebuts, refutes or otherwise solidifies your position against my critique. In fact you've merely solidified my point that the issue is environmental.
You would be in a better position positing that studies on guppies aren't applicable to humans, albeit in doing so undermining r/k analysis (something typically used in cross species analysis).
I did mention that guppies aren't applicable to humans when I said you cherry picked stuff that would try and prove your silly argument wrong to save face on the internet.
All you have ever wanted to do is feel sorry for yourself. If you're that big of a fucking loser then do it. I still think you might have some redeeming quality that you could capitalize on but if you're going to give up and try and get pity from everyone then we didn't need you anyway.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk
I've presented more backing for anything I've said here than you, without attempting to psychologize you.
You cannot make a "natural selection" based argument without opening yourself up to literature on "natural selection."
