Replying to nobody

No.

I'm not advocating for that.

But Satoshi is on record saying the blocksize would become an issue eventually. And the ordinal issue is real. Sort of a loophole/oversight.

I LIKE that Security and Decentralization were prioritized over Scalability... but I think something can be innovated to help alleviate high network fees.

Would he sensible to figure it out. While also keeping digital space minimal thereby allowing a maximal amount of full nodes.
Avatar
corndalorian 2y ago

It’s not just about prioritizing decentralization. Decentralization IS the innovation with bitcoin. Without it there is no point in having bitcoin. Decentralization is why there will only ever be 21 million bitcoin, it’s why the consensus protocol is resistant to being changed, and why the ledger of transactions is immutable. Increasing block size increases centralization. This is not a new debate, and it absolutely resulted in hard forks of bitcoin. You seem to be talking out of both sides of your mouth on that point. As for innovating something to alleviate network fees, it has been created— the lightning network. And other layered approaches are being created too, such as ecash/cashu.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.