Well that’s good! Hmm that’s crazy about the bulb! From the research I’ve done there are definitely people who are more or less sensitive to EMF/RF than others. I wonder if it’s like just 10-20% of the population that is severely affected and that’s why most people don’t have an issue with any of it. And the small issues most people have are chalked off to other stuff. I believe you saw what you saw, but there is no way holding a phone against your head is good. There are studies of tumors in phone dominant sides of head and women’s breasts where they keep phone tucked in bra while jogging, also noticeable increase in cancers and neurological issues in area with big towers put up. I imagine the issue is ultimately like lead in paint or asbestos in building materials. It didn’t kill off humanity but eventually symptoms caused got worse and worse over the years. I mean doctors use to smoke in their offices 😁

Anyways I hope it’s all a big nothing burger because most of us are bathing in this shit!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with you that holding a transmitting antenna against your head for long periods is a bad idea, if the transmit wavelength is comparable to body size or organ size -- generally from 100 MHz up. (That can cause unnatural heating and possibly damage tissues.) That's because of the inverse square law, which tells us that field strengths go up 6 decibels every time you halve the distance from the antenna. If your phone is 24 inches from you while using speakerphone, do the math compared to holding it a twentieth of an inch away when not on speakerphone -- it comes out to be a 54 dB increase. That means holding a 3-Watt phone next to your head is the equivalent of a 753,000-Watt phone two feet away! Huge difference.