apparently, official statements aren't enough for the police department because why am I being asked the same question repeatedly?

the detective asked me the same one probably ten times already.

ma'am, I don't want to remember, that's why you have a recorded statement given with as much clarity as possible when the memory of the specifics were fresh in the dome.

you don't need clarity, you need to investigate.

the overall memory will remain, and so will whatever footage they allegedly got out of it.

have a feeling that everyone knows this one's about to get gnarly.

"well how'd you know what time it was after?" (a presumptive question)

because I looked at my phone.

"how long was it after you said you were gonna faint that he stopped?"

not soon enough, clearly. and why's he trying to do sexual things with a woman who's about to faint.

what's next? they're gonna admit that there's a video and then tell me that I wanted it so I could become a Hollywood star?

that, in itself, is enough to seal the deal because that's illegal and non-consensual.

"well, Diddy did it, does that mean everyone he did it to is innocent?"

stop trying to use my life as a litmus-test for proper litigation please.

in general, it's just a bad idea to give somebody potentially-laced legal or illegal drugs and film it. it's also illegal, but what police department wants to open up THAT can of worms?