Clowns making claims they are not qualified to make and then putting the burden of proof on you… 😂

Buzz off.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with #[5]​ … existing clients should be as accessible as possible. It’s not fair to tell a person with a disability that they can’t use a leading app just because the developer didn’t want to make it accessible.

It’s like saying to people in a wheelchair “no you can’t use public transit because our buses are not accessible… so go build your own transit system”.

Damus has some (very basic) accessibility features such as an option to disable animations, and the ability for Damus to respect font size as set up in iOS as opposed to use a randomly small text size as in the earlier version. That doesn’t hinder the experience for anyone.

cc: #[9]​ #[10]

I’m not arguing against making things accessible. And I’m not even against being wrong on this issue. What I dislike is people drawing conclusions on some thing they didn’t really research and then throw links at me hoping I’m going to read the thing that satisfies their claims.

Most of the time the content linked doesn’t even address their claims and it’s a waste of time. Not my fault they can’t read or think beyond a headline…

_______🫸🥅