Nostr

Response to Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick or, as I would title it, Everything Is A Non-Melanated Power-Hungry Man’s Trick Who Likes To Think of Himself as Rich

First of all, there are three images the powers that media love to implant in our minds. One is that JFK murder. Talk about it ad infinitum, make movies about it, analyze the bullets, rinse and repeat. The second is The Holocaust (of which there apparently has only been One in human history that’s why we call it The) particularly the emaciated body dump. And the third is the naked whipping of a healthy and vibrant melanated man or woman’s body, bound and beaten until it bleeds. You can’t really imagine Follywood without these three image tropes. And there is a desire, perhaps a need even, to have these three images cycle through the public’s subconscious mind over and over and over. If it seems to be fading, then it’s time for a new doc or film! This shockumentary serves up two of the three. If you want your slave whip fix you can stream the made for beating adaptation of Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad (Jenkins, 2021). As regards this doc, there’s really only one melanated person I can recall (besides a bystander or two) and she’s a journalist who goes down in a plane. So, this is really a movie about the Caucasian Mafia and their enablers, or, if we are to use their recently acquired moniker: 83.

Secondly, there’s only one interesting point in the whole hour upon hour into a third hour plus film (we already knew Castro came from a “white” aristocratic family and that the European ruling elite aren’t of one national genetic lineage i.e. that the Windsors changed their name from the German Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in 1917, I mean, what did you think Anglo-SAXON meant? There’s a reason the British disRoyal family could easily swap places with the characters in Reygadas’ Stellet Licht.) and that is the body double theory. I won’t spoil it as it’s a gory theory I’d prefer not even to know about. However, I do now know why a smug Bill Gates delivered that cryptically awkward “well…he’s dead” to Judy Woodruff because most probably Epstein is verifiably NOT dead and Bill knows the truth. Poor Ghislaine can comfort herself that at least she won’t meet her end by being pushed off a yacht like her Czech born Tata. That fate will more likely belong to Jeffrey if he is alive, and if Bill’s the one who will do the dirty deed none will be the wiser and even less will care.

And now, my Ten Points of Thoughts on the shock-you-meant-ary:

1. Gone are the days of Michael Moore’s teddy bearish bushspiracy docs—now we get creepy ones with British malocclusion.

2. The CD rack. If the interview had actually been filmed in the 90’s/00’s the videographer would have moved the rack out of the shot as it would have made the speaker seem less professional. If it was filmed recently and made to look as if it was filmed twenty years ago, the videographer would have placed the CD rack to be HIGHLY VISIBLE.

3. No date of the doc in the end titles. Or anywhere for that matter. Notable absence. Filmmakers almost always date their work. We only forget to do so on rough cuts and this was not a rough cut, it was highly polished. Do you know how hard it is to make ten minutes of narrative footage interesting, let alone 208? Not amateur work at all. Not. At. All. Made to look as if it is, though.

4. Filmmaker can adeptly download and edit clips from YouTube and Google (like where are these shared Google Drives where I can access masses of digitized historic footage? Not a lot of stock looking stuff to me) but makes retro scrolling VHSy titles. This was made in the past few years—it’s brand new. Comments indicating otherwise are decoys.

5. Woody Harrelson must be some running inside joke. Werner Herzog in his Grizzly Man mock-you-meant-ary (like this one, the goal meaning to mock you, the spectator) had his character end up following bears in the woods because he lost the Cheers casting job to none other than: Woody Harrelson. Or perhaps it all fits together oh so well: either Woody’s Dad is a hired actor OR he’s mafia. Either way: It’s All In The Family. Perhaps he’s even both.

6. There are quite a significant number of people named JACK in this saga. I point this out merely because atjack posted this doc. Twice. First a Rumble link, then YT. You know, someone might take it down from YT because it’s oh so controversial. Challenges the Main Stream narrative. Please. The Main Stream has been telling a version of this same story for decades. Oliver Stone must have won four Academy Awards because he’s such a Hollywood outsider. Yes, four. Lots of Mafia stories. No surprise there. Write what you know! So goes the old industry adage. (You do not make a convincing movie about a porn star as a teenager if you did not grow up wandering around porn film sets as a youth. See: Paul Thomas Anderson. Raised as a Roman Catholic! No surprise there.)

7. Since when did you last hear of a Brit calling for revolution in the USA? Due to whatever daddy-complex Americans have as regards their former (or current) rulers they do tend to associate the bri-ish accent with learned (UK English = educated) authority thus it’s used here for that sole reason. Affixed a lame “call to action” at the end even though the narrator doesn’t care to mention his revolution in the first three and a half hours. Not a peep about it until just shy of the end!

8. Narrator tells you 3/4th in that 3/4th of the speakers in the doc are paid actors. I mean, he says it’s those “other” docs. Implicitly, it’s his as well.

9. That mafia dons put the Kennedies (morbid key word: Kenne-dies) in power makes perfect sense. I had already assumed on my own that the manner in which the family gets taken out (which is straight out of a Sicilian vendetta flick) meant that they were in some losing game in a multi-clan mafia-like conflict. Guess they couldn’t pay the debt or didn’t want to; either way, they went back on a deal and suffered the consequences. (RFK Jr. literally just tried WITH NO IRONY WHATSOEVER to make his Epstein flights sound like wholesome family trips: “we brought the kids!”). Ah well, guess some mafia families don’t have pockmarked faces. Good to know! Too bad that good looks don’t seem to be a saving grace for the Kennedys. Makes for excellent casting, though.

10. Um…the coffin rituals? Things you wish you didn’t know. Sure does cure envy of the so-called rich and powerful. “Yeah, thanks, I’m good. Keep your fake money and your illusion of power. I’ll keep my health, integrity and sanity.” Or, perhaps that’s what you want me to think: that riches come from compromising ethics and values by cooperating with demons not as blessings from on high for moral behavior consistent with integrity. I’ll stick with the later but thanks for the offer.

In conclusion, there’s definitely a reboot of the Kennedy narrative going on and I will tell you what it is all about. Some people like to worship the murder of a man whom we all know about, that fellow who died on a cross. And they would simulateously like to present themselves to the public as this man: as innocent. The problem is, they are not innocent. They are not of that “blameless race,” as Homer wrote of the Ethiopians. They NEVER worshipped the Word of God, they worshipped the killing of The Savior. In their so-called churches they hung his bleeding body next to their pulpit and proudly wore the site of his murder around their necks. The whole time they worshiped his destruction. They sacrificed Him; they are NOT him. The killing of JFK is NOT a modern day tale of the Son of Man. And trying to rope Malcolm X and Martin Luther King (i.e. in Four Died Trying, another reboot, although not pretending to be underground just pretending to be indie) into a similar parable to try to play like you’re a Lamb and not a Wolf is a last ditch pathetic clout-chasing effort to hitch a ride alongside bonafide leaders like X. Different folks entirely. (Due to further research the only information I obliquely received from the FDT movie was that the main journalist involved in it couldn’t help but brag on his website that he was the Dad of the director of The Last Black Man in SF, that cringe movie you see and wonder how can such schlock get made, and now I know the nepo line: Talbots, grandfather Lyle who co-founded SAG and Daddy David who thinks the phrase “there’s a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in” is from Leonard Cohen not Rumi (see his article “At 60, We’re Winning — And Losing — The Media War”). And he calls himself a writer? Uneducated at best, disinformation agent at worst. Some people love to take credit for other people’s work, other people’s stories, and other people’s identities. They get called “ish” and are classed in the ranks of 83. You can run but you can’t hide; we see you hiding in the sheep wool clothing, just like we see it is written that the Savior had hair like sheep’s wool and feet of burnished bronze, Rev 1:14-15.). Oh, but Catholicks don’t much like the Book of Revelation. Why did they even include it, just to round out at the number of books at 66? Once a Mafia, always a Mafia. Who cares if the CIA killed JFK? It’s still Mafia. Just like the Catholic Church. Which is why I call it The Vatican’t.

It’s Game Over, 83. And you can’t do anything about it. Propaganda tricks don’t hit like they used to, huh? As Chinua said: Things Fall Apart. But what’s falling apart this time is you and your narrative threads weaving tales of deception.

Let me end with a quote from Homer (Alexander Pope translation, 1715):

‘The Sire of Gods, and all th’ ethereal train,

On the warm limits of the farthest main,

Now mix with mortals, nor disdain to grace,

The feasts of Æthiopia’s blameless race:’

The Aethiopis is the 7th epic of the Epic Cycle (of which there were twelve and supposedly only the Illiad and the Odyssey survived. Me personally, I would bet it’s hiding in that Vatican’t-tell-the-truth library and proves Achilles was Ethiopian, as it’s a story about him). We got way more important histories and stories to deal with than who killed the Kennedys. Study your bullets all you want and pretend like there’s a narrative dispute in D.C. and Follywood when you are all in agreement to distort the truth and foment chaos. The Devil is the author of chaos and confusion and there was nothing more chaotic or confusing than this shockumentary. Which is why it’s clearly propaganda.

You’re like why is she so obsessed with Ethiopia? Because part of the Control narrative is the distortion of history. We’re not doing some retroactive affirmative action here. There is such a thing as the Truth. And there are such things as Lies. Have you noticed Truth is singular? It’s because there is only ONE Truth while there are oh so many lies. But the Truth stands alone. Truths doesn’t really roll off the tongue.

Reply to this note

Discussion