Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar jleger2023

My issue is not with the individual operator's right to make a decision. It's with some external person or group being able to impose *their* decision on *my* property as an operator.

For instance, I'm all for banning bots. Mass-distribution of spam is not (imo) freedom of speech because it's not one human person typing out their thoughts into a note. Mass spamming should be stopped imo, though I'm also in favor of relay operators who disagree having the right to allow all the spam into their databases if they choose.

The important distinction here is simple: only the property owner has the right to choose who can occupy their property. The coffee shop owner has the right to allow the screaming idiot in their shop if they choose, but they also must be willing to face the consequences of allowing it (lost business). But no external party should be able to tell the coffee shop owner what behavior they can and cannot allow. Let the market decide.

Avatar
boston wine 2y ago

A well thought out opinion!

Is the client dev a property owner?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
jleger2023 2y ago

Yes, because they have control over what they allow into/out of the client. But all the users also have an option of whether to use that client or abandon it in favor of one that more adheres to their own worldview/principles.

Avatar
boston wine 2y ago

Absolutely agreed there. Thanks for the thoughtful discussion 🫂

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed