To @realDonaldTrump I recognized earlier than the speaker of the United States House of Representatives Mike Johnson that the Department of Justice was a destroyer of the rule of law, opposing the U.S. Constitution and laws. Prosecutors and various law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, are under its control. For many years, there have been signs that they have weaponized their prosecutorial powers as tools of the Democratic Party. Since the Obama administration, the Department of Justice has been used as a weapon against the Republican Party, operating with complete injustice.
Firstly, I have stated publicly and privately a long time ago that in the case of classified documents where both incidents involve the mishandling of classified documents, the Department of Justice has handled things very differently. Prosecutors had claimed that due to Biden being older and suffering from memory decline (blurry-eyed) at the time, it was difficult to prosecute him for privately retaining classified documents. However, Biden, who was vice president eight years ago, was younger than Trump is today. On the other hand, despite being the same type of classified documents case, the Department of Justice has relentlessly pursued Trump. This is even in the context where judges have determined that the prosecutors, essentially Biden's Department of Justice, have fabricated, forged, and tampered with evidence. The question arises: why is there such a determination to prosecute Trump under these circumstances?
Secondly, in the so-called hush-money case, three witnesses among those specifically sourced by Biden's Department of Justice, Biden's prosecutors, and Biden's judges in New York, including adult film star Daniels, Trump’s former CFO Allen Weisselberg, and Hope Hicks, who resigned from her position as the White House Director of Communications during the Trump administration, all praised Trump highly. They clarified that the matter was completely unrelated to the election, aiming solely to protect the feelings of Trump's wife, Melania. Under these circumstances, should the trial be immediately terminated and a not-guilty verdict declared? Why convene a jury and prevent Trump, a presidential candidate, from speaking during the campaign period? In human history, there is no precedent for silencing a defendant! Since they prevent him from speaking, why bother summoning Trump to court every time? This matter is so straightforward that even a pig could understand it. Of course, Americans are not fools.
By Jiangbing He, a financial economist who has been following the United States for many years in China.
我比美国众议院约翰逊更早地认为美国司法部是一个法治地破坏者，反对美国宪法和法律的部门。检察官和各种警察机构，包括FBI都在它的管制之内。他们在起诉所谓的罪犯或嫌疑人方面有武器化作为民主党枪杆的迹象已经多年。自从奥巴马开始，司法部就成了打击共和党的一个枪杆，他们是完全不公正的。
其一，很早我就公开和私下说过，同样是机密文件案（"classified documents case"），检察官在对拜登当副总统的时候私自保留机密文件案，称8年前的比现在特朗普还年轻的拜登是老眼昏花不予起诉。那同样的是机密文件案，司法部为何咬住川普不放，并且这还是在法官认定检察官也就是拜登的司法部造假、伪造和篡改证据的情况下，为何坚持要起诉川普。
第二，在所谓的封口案中，拜登的司法部、拜登的检察官、拜登的纽约法官和检察官，亲自找的证人里有三位，包括艳星Daniels、川普的前财务总监Allen Weisselberg以及从川普政府辞职的白宫通讯主管 Hope Hicks都对川普大加赞赏，并表明该事件完全与选举无关只是为了照顾川普夫人Melania的感受。在这种情况下，是否应该立即终止审判、宣布无罪？为什么还搞个陪审团，不让作为总统竞选人的川普在竞选期间发言。在人类历史上，没有说不让被告发言的，既然不让发言，何必每次都让川普到法庭干什么？这么简单的事情，就算猪都能想明白，当然，美国人不全是猪。 