Replying to Avatar thesimplekid

Anyone else get this when trying to zap one #[0] with CLN? Used to work not sure what changed
Avatar
ZEUS 2y ago

A bit of a controversy where they required the description alongside its hash in v23 of CLN. It got rolled back in v23.02.2

See

https://twitter.com/arcbtc/status/1635214760852750336

https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/pull/6092

https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/releases/tag/v23.02.2

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
thesimplekid 2y ago

Thank you, intresting will have to look into the reasoning

Avatar
thesimplekid 2y ago

#[2] #[3] #[4]

Do you have an opinion on this as I think (draft) NIP 47 would have to be updated to include the description?

Avatar
Kwinten 2y ago

I don't see why if they rolled it back.

Avatar
Kwinten 2y ago

I don't know what the reasoning was but they can't go around refusing to pay the most common form of invoice that gets used today...