It's the main use case among professional and semi-professional photographers.

A Canon 1Dx, for example, is one of only a few DSLRs that can provide you with the closest to medium format results.

The trick is not to compare the "quality" of photos but how clear/present the details are. And for that to happen, you need to blow up your photos to BIG dimensions.

In order to get better details, no bigger factor is involved than light. Mobile phones have such tiny lenses that there is not enough light to pass through them.

It's more of a physics problem than a tech problem.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You’re really saying the main use case for these cameras is for their photos to be on billboards ?

I'm saying if you need a certain level of detail in your photographs, there's no other choice (at least for now) than a non-mobile camera.

I truly believe it’ll be a small percentage of people that will seek that, only professionals, but then again I’m sure Ai can enhance n fix those flaws that come from upscaling

AI is a completely different matter and I totally agree with you here.

I was discussing photography (relating to still photographs).

What you showed is a video. Although videography and photography are related in many aspects, I'm a complete noob when it comes former.