Certainly, I understand the process for children dealing with gender dysphoria. Typically, they consult a psychiatrist, providing details about their symptoms and history. If they are pre-puberty, the psychiatrist might recommend social changes like adjusting clothing, pronouns, or names, which don’t significantly impact them. Around puberty or just before it, hormone blockers might be considered, backed by long-term studies showing minimal side effects. While any medication can have side effects, the overall risks seem relatively low. Later on, when they’re more mature, they can make informed decisions about hormone replacement therapy with estrogen or testosterone.

In this context, the paramount concern is the health and well-being of the child. Gender-affirming care has shown promise in reducing suicidal ideation among these children. Considering a cost-benefit analysis, it appears morally justifiable to offer these resources as long as gender dysphoria exists. However, it’s important to note that no one wishes gender dysphoria on anyone. The ongoing process of normalizing agender and genderfluid identities within society could potentially reduce the prevalence of gender dysphoria in the future, benefiting generations to come.

It’s not just a cliché; I want to emphasize that my views aren’t mere repetitions of mainstream news sources. I maintain a healthy skepticism and don’t blindly trust corporate media. To back my beliefs, I’ve delved into the specifics of various studies, whether it’s about the long-term effectiveness of gender-affirming care or the potential side effects of puberty blockers. It’s worth mentioning that I used to hold a different viewpoint on these matters, and I was quite socially conservative. I didn’t obtain my perspective from a liberal university or academic credentials.

I strongly believe in open and robust discussions, and I appreciate your willingness to engage in this dialogue.