TIL the word privacy does not appear in any of the 59 pages of the lightning network whitepaper: https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

By contrast, the bitcoin whitepaper has a half-page dedicated to privacy (the whole thing is only 9 pages)

Perhaps privacy wasn't a focus of LN's inventors

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ha! That's a good catch.

The paper had some tremendously insightful thinking in it, but it was terribly hard to read, I found.

impossible

I really hope #cashu nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgkwaehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvshszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qrxnfk is the answer. Especially if we are able to minimize impact from custodial solutions. Federation is great but I don't know many people running a lightning node... so building a community that is trusted and technically skilled is hard. It should be possible to achieve privacy even if you are using custodial backends. Could maybe bolt12 help with that?

> I really hope cashu is the answer

The answer to what?

I think cashu is great for small amounts that you're okay with losing

It can maybe also serve a useful purpose as some sort of modern mixer, still thinking about that though

Privacy... In my opinion it is digital cash, although it is currently a custodial solution. If we find a way to implement #cashu within lightning itself, it's unstoppable. We don't need to make custodians obsolete, we just need to make it hard or impossible to analyze our transactions.

It was not.

It also described 133MB blocks as necessary for on boarding the global majority into a noncustodial LN.