Hypothetical: country A unjustly invades country B and steals their bitcoin.
Do you (and your node):
A) reject transactions involving stolen coins & split the chain
OR
B) accept stolen coins to keep chain from splitting.
Maybe invading state will be wise and mix stolen funds to restore coin fungibility so it would be impossible to identify stolen coins. That would probably be best outcome.
Or maybe A won’t invade B because of how easy it is to evade capture with private key material.
Please Login to reply.
No replies yet.