Well, Darwin's research is flawed and even he questioned some of his own conclusions later in life, particularly the micro proving macro theory.
Discussion
How is it flawed?
When he himself re-thinks his conclusions but his advocates ignore that part, its flawed. He stated that eyes being the same in all animals that have them disproves evolution. That evolution could not have possibly lead to all operating identically and being structurally identical. His words not mine
That’s normal. You’re supposed to question and scrutinize your own theories. What matters is if the theories have been disproven.
Yes it is, but his modern devotees ignore those things since it breaks their narratives
Idk about those people so I won’t comment
The scientists who promote darwinism is what I am talking about. Like those who's resesrch would be in the book you told me about. They ignore all of Darwins questioning of his own work. Modern Darwinism is very divergent from Darwin.
I can’t comment on that idk what those questions are. The eye ball one I already shared the evidence for. I will add that Darwin came up with his theory a long time ago and he didn’t live long enough to expand on the new evidence that we’ve found. New fossils and dna gave us a clearer picture. Also a lot of his focus was on plants and how you could actively select for certain traits. Darwin talked about how breeders of plants and animals seem to understand evolution better because they’re seeing it in a simulated environment.