Yes but my point is, the value of that is substantially less than taking over something... For example, it is always possible to disrupt Bitcoin but because the cost of taking it over forever or for long term is astronomical, we see way less attempts of disruption at all.

I only say that because I am working on a decentralised registry of short names, so the distinction between taking over a name Vs just disrupting the system is very important and very much on my mind at the moment