That assumes he's not already acting on their behalf...
What if MSTR has always been a gov front company, and Saylor has always been an asset?
Discussion
I wouldn’t be surprised at all.
But what difference would it make if we knew for sure he was? It doesn’t change anything about Bitcoin or the value prop of it, we already know we can’t stop our enemies from using it.
I guess the arms race to stack would heat up a bit more but other than that I don’t think much would change.
this is the way...
same goes for segwit (still!) and ANY change to code.
imagine the sheer amount of war-gaming gone into bitcoin neutralization (unless, perhaps, it was created as a pressure release valve on a collapsing system by invisible hand who thoroughly understood and controlled limits of guv and other entities conjured with the abuse of the word) - any move could be a small part in a decades long strategy that no one can see until too late...
or maybe its already too late to stop btc...
all this maybe and unless and perhaps might mean the following:
Legacy is the best way to store long term.
Ethereum was the result of war-gaming Bitcoin. I don’t necessarily mean Vitalik was in a war-game with US Gov operatives and they sent him out to destroy it but rather they would have deduced the best way to attack Bitcoin was to surround it with shitcoins, that are full of scams, lump it all together under “crypto” (which sounds shady to people who don’t know what cryptography is), obfuscate the zero to one invention amongst a sea of garbage and hope that it just becomes unpalatable for normies to look into.
They can’t kill it now, they just want it to remain ethereal.
