Replying to 6134b9e7...

nostr:npub1ju6ew6cfmd529jfc4ugm8csqe528r94nqcf40jwsg7ugvpsg8sesv9hn75 nostr:npub1kjauf5ae53pstgv9u7mkfw2lzluyvtqhev6tj5fx85kfthck7r8qgke5gq

It's actually cheaper to imprison then for life than to execute them anyways (due to the cost of appeals, etc) so the cost argument holds no water.

The state should not be in the business of taking lives. It's time the US joined the rest of the civilized world.

nostr:npub1s2eqpzhm9f7u6scnd6wjxs50udf8uv9mp9e9g85hk4v3c29ee72szd3d24 nostr:npub1ju6ew6cfmd529jfc4ugm8csqe528r94nqcf40jwsg7ugvpsg8sesv9hn75 Criminals can also appeal life sentences too (so that argument does not make any sense). That said, if someone willingly takes a life, then their life should also be forfeited as well (especially if it involves children). There is no reason for them to remain alive after willingly murdering others.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.