Nostr Web Client

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Having #1tap2zap is a game changer. It makes #OnlyZaps that much easier. We need more Lightning wallets and Nostr clients to implement Nostr Wallet Connect. 🫂.

#[0], you're our rising star here. What's the ETA on adding this feature? Don't let Ably have all of the fun!

#[1] brother, I know you have working WebLN and LNC, but what about another

#[2] my man, Iris need Nostr Wallet Connect love.

#[3] Plebstr should join the Nostr Wallet Connect train.

Let's make it happen. If you're adding #OnlyZaps support, make this feature viable for your users by adding Nostr Wallet Connect support. Thanks!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

m2carbine 2y ago

Derek Ross 2y ago

👀 I get what you're throwing down.

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

Yes make users use centralized services to interact with Nostr. Even running your own lightning node is a centralized service you dumb sheep. I’m going to laugh so hard when it blows up in your faces

Derek Ross 2y ago

Thank you for using my centralized service Nostr Plebs 💜

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

How much #bitcoin can you get in the rug pull realistically? Even 1?

Derek Ross 2y ago

The key is to stop once we hit 22 million bitcoin.

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

You better pull your rug pull before LND and Core pull theirs

Derek Ross 2y ago

Bitcoin Core and LND are going to rug us? Do tell.

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

Last fall bitcoind lost sync with bitcoin core and all LND channels were unable to be closed unless they updated their nodes with an emergency update they pushed through in less than 24 hours. That sounds very centralized and very dangerous. Leaves a door wide open for a bad actor to desync bitcoind again and push an update that either taxes channel owners or has them force close all channels. And if LND can do this they can all do this in one way or another

Derek Ross 2y ago

I remember, but it's not as how you described. It was a bug in btcd, not bitcoind. LND does use btcd, and yes a bug did exist, but updating your node with the patch fixed it. If you don't like LND, you can use Core LN, Eclair, LDK, etc. Other implementations exist.

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

I don’t like any implementation that forces me to update my node when there is a bug just to get my funds back. My L1 bitcoin can never be frozen. I do not rely on devs to bail me out anymore. I no longer have to pray that they are not bad actors anymore. No bug will bring me down. I no longer have to trust anyone but myself

Derek Ross 2y ago

I'm surprised that you're still running the original version of Bitcoin that Satoshi released. That's impressive.

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

I run the original code that capped bitcoins supply at 21,000,000. In my view that was when bitcoin really launched. My node only knows of 21,000,000

Mr. Freedom 2y ago

I am also planning on creating my own bitcoin software from scratch one day. Just procrastinating

Paul 2y ago

Strike too, please!

#[6]

Derek Ross 2y ago

Strike needs to add Lightning addresses first. Though #[3]'s Lightning addresses via strike.army does fill this void quite well!

Paul 2y ago

Well, I use Strike only for outgoing zaps ⚡️

Incoming is WoS for me which works great.

Artur…qywr 2y ago

Me too. It’s the perfect setup. Fiat gets converted to Sats to never be seen again. It’s like feeding the Lightning Network with fresh fiat instead of circulating my own Sats. Thank you #[7]