"A judge" its literally the "opinion" of the supreme court.
Invasion and tresson justify violence. Your definition of those words doesn't meet the standard of the highest law of the land. If the supreme courts opinion isn't valid, then I assert that you are being treasonous and all violence against you is permitted, because we're just using arbitrary definitions.
Nope. You're conflating judgement and governance.
lol look how quickly you've decided that violence against me is warranted and I'm a random citizen. Funny how that works.
I think I'll take this as you conceding your argument because you've now advocated for the force of the American government to be levied on me as a tactic of debate.
We're done here. Bye.
See, you don't like when an arbitrary definition of treason is applied to you. Lol I just used your own logic against you and it triggered you so bad you rage quit
