Why Institutions Won’t Hold Monero

Institutions won’t hold Monero, not because they can’t — but because they shouldn’t.

Privacy by default breaks every compliance model they rely on. You can’t audit what you can’t see, and regulators hate the dark.

KYC is the first wall that keeps institutions out of Monero. You can’t mix mandatory identity checks with default anonymity — it’s oil and water.

Monero's design structure scares regulators. Monero was built for consent, not surveillance.

Monero doesn’t fit into the “custody” infrastructure Wall Street built.

No one can freeze it, whitelist it, or “approve” a transaction. That’s beautiful for individuals, but lethal for funds that live off regulatory approval. That means fungibility.

They can’t use Monero as a speculative asset safely either. There are no ETFs, no compliant custodians, and no liquidity pipelines that don’t trigger AML red flags.

Owning it openly would invite questions they don’t want to answer.

Even if they hold it secretly, they can’t leverage it. No collateralization, no staking yields, no paper derivatives. Monero resists financialization — and that’s its strength.

Institutions manage reputation. Monero manages freedom.

One runs on trust, the other on math.

That’s why they’ll keep watching from the sidelines — and the rest of us will keep transacting in peace.

᎞ᔉᔗ á”€Ê°á”‰Êłá”‰ ᎟ᔉ áŽ°á”ƒÊłá”đŸŽaÂł

Lunarpunk🌒

That's why #Monero

#agorist #monerist

#SovereignIndividual

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

In theory they can do it in a transparent way if they yake advanatve of the viewkeys. It would be better and more transparwnt than holding cash