So wtf would Saylor say about its potential as a currency for activists and billions under authoritarian regimes?

It’s a great store of value, great as digital property, but I’d like to see more folks give a damn about advocating tools for it to be a great medium of exchange, private, and peer-to-peer. nostr:note1t7dcdzzc7eje6cy47svlsqxr9utv9dr50pezkfcrr5cyqvcnr2sstee6nq

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

more people are using it as a store of value than a currency, but that doesn't mean that it can't be a good currency. it's just not a popular currency - yet.

Yet is the key word. And yea the most immediate use case that people jump on board for is SoV. But it shouldn’t stop there. In fact world governments would LOVE if we just stopped there.

I didn’t come here to watch billionars convert their yachts to bitcoin (that’s fine if they do). I came here for freedom money and a better world for everyone. Fuck you money ✌🏻🧡

I completely understand the importantance of a rock-solid base layer...🤔😄...but...

Are there any *really promising* newer/better/more reliable/easier to scale and use layer two solutions being developed?😳❓

I think things like lightning and eCash are just getting started.

And we need more devs doing this work, and more funding for them. And more funding rounds and serious money into Lightning companies, which will come.

Thank god for nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f as well.

Saylor doesn’t give a fuck about those people. To him the world is a giant corporate balance sheet.