what they’ve written is simply factual.
why do you imply that it’s not?
Discussion
Well, he didn't win with racist outburst, that's not a thing. He isn't technically a convicted felon in NY yet, as his sentencing hasn't happened.
au contraire mon frère à tout ça. it’s factual. on the nose.
except they could’ve added another to name.
Ummm, ok. Except as I pointed out, it isn't.
oh, but it is.
I don't follow? He literally isn't a convicted felon yet. Could be soon, but not yet. He didn't have racist outbursts during the campaign. Your logic makes no sense
i dont understand why you do not understand. i wish it were easy to tell/show you in detail. you could simply google for criminal convictions and numerous other serious cases/criminalty…don’t think he yelled slurs, but there are millions of ways to show racism and be racist.
