Its a good rant. I'd say God is infinite, and so any positive statement about him is probably incomplete. Its only apophatic statements that can be true, and then very few even of those. The thing is, people understand statements in a reductive way - if I say, "God is love," then people understand that as, "God is not hate." Or I say, "God is within," and people understand it as, "God is not external." God's everywhere and everything, even the contradictions. Even destruction is a version of God's love. Even suffering. Every "thing" is a symbol of God, both physical and mental, and every process and transformation is symbolic of God's will.

There's no way to know anything, not truly, unless the knowledge is dependent on the context defined by humans, which is always incomplete. Complete knowledge would require complete being - God is the complete being, the reality itself. That's not reductive - God can have all other attributes without losing any possible attributes, because thats the meaning of completeness. If someone has met some measure of God's personality, that doesn't mean God isn't reality itself as well. No subtraction could ever reduce an infinite, or complete, entity. The "fullness" of God, which sometimes people talk about, is the unbounded potential and creative force, the "dao" or spirit that moves within and precedes all things.

Now I sit back and wait to see if a religious person attacks, lol.