GPT-4.5 was judged to be the human 73% of the time when prompted to use a human-like persona. 👀
Discussion
💀
Good post bud.
Any can. Ask it to leave text errors in after asking it to sound human like.
Pass every time.
the rate of passing is what is astonishing here. 73% is incredibly high. in 6 months that will be near 100%.
No way it would pass if I give it just 1 question …. Just ask it the square root of 94857484949484
someone will use this model and prompt to create nostr bots. give them a couple days and you can ask them yourself.
GPT 4.5 is above all expensive. Avoid it like the plague if you want to let it run wild.
I bet most of the top models would achieve the same success in pretending to be a human if prompted right.
I got a bot generator half way working but decided to abandon it because it would likely generate a lot of spam
The inverse Turing test. Doesn't work if the LLM is prompted right.
Do I get paid the $15 for participating in this stupid test regardless of my answers?
(I would tell my LLM to use variations of this reply on regardless what the interviewer asks.)
are you working for sam Altman pr department now? Maybe you want to sell us some worldcoin
yes. please DM me a scan of your retina and ill get you all setup.
You’re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of a sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’t, not without your help. But you’re not helping. Why is that?
You're the interviewer or the bot trying to pass as a psychopath human?
Humans are gullible
yeah, and "on average" means IQ 100
i have very rarely got a sniff of artificial on anything i've seen since this shit got all popular
show me some code human vs AI and i bet i can tell you exactly why it looks wrong to me also
AI is just ... you know... artificial... like nutrasweet and spandex
it's not healthy, and it's not sustainable
seriously, "judged" by who?
if it's "random average randos" then you better show us your double blind study bitchez
We are living in exciting time .. let’s go