All science should be questioned.
I have no problem with the people that try to prove things wrong.
My problem is with the people that want me to believe without question.
Discussion
Science is the process of questioning. Two essential ingredients though: being verifiable and being falsifiable.
It's very telling and a sad state of affairs when people think watching a YouTube video equals "don't trust, verify"
Instead I'd encourage anyone who's genuinely interested to read up on Fourier's equations (early 19th century), the ground breaking work of Foote and Tyndall who discovered how the "greenhouse effect" works in the 1850s and Arrhenius who made accurate predictions on radiative forcing around 1900.
This is all science that's uncontaminated by the FED, which was only established in 1913 😉
Still, genuinely interested if 1) you gave the debunk a chance (it's not easy going against your own confirmation bias), 2) did it make you more skeptical towards the original
yes I watched it for the second time this evening.
The reality is that scientists should always have different opinions. the thing to do is to look at the data for yourself.
if you want to do that, then Google the average sea level rise per year for the last 100 years. then look at the same for the last 20000 years.
if they haven't changed the numbers since I last looked, then you will find that the average of the average of the last 100 years is 2mm per year.
The average of the last 20000 years is 6mm per year.
Conclusion: no climate emergency.
If you can give me any data that conflicts with this, then I'd be happy to have a look.