Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar utxo the webmaster ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป

It pains me to say it after 3 years of building on it but I think lightning is ngmi, at least for non custodial pleb payments.

I think ark and liquid are fundamentally a more sound approach to L2 for end users.

If it REQUIRES the end user to run infrastructure, even if that is just a phone, it's going to be too janky to actually scale.

Not to mention that somehow lightning is already more ossified than L1...

If we continue down the custodian route people will get rugged or KYC d

I am ready for your hate, but this is my current take. Also would be happy to be proven wrong.

Now back to sshing into my node and working on chantools to recover a force closed channel utxo that lnd didn't report.

Totally easy for everyday users to solve if they run into this problem...

Avatar
๐–‹๐–Ž๐–†๐–™๐–‰๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–Š๐–— (ยฏ`โ—•โ€ฟโ—•ยดยฏ) 2y ago

Self custody your lightning bitcoin in your own node and send it to a lightning custodian when you need to spend. What is so difficult with that? ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
utxo the webmaster ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป 2y ago

You have no privacy from your custodian and risk getting rugged.

Thread collapsed
e9
Alaska PC Small Group 2y ago

Why sent from self custody to custodial?

Thread collapsed