i think there is a misunderstanding. maybe translation error, but for me:

answer implys a question; and both imply a civilized behavior. under such condition violance is by definition wrong. when there 'is time', we should do everything possible to solve conflicts non-violently, which still means that we have to 'fight' for our 'god given rights'.

however, violance is justified in a matter of 'response' when someone takes your natural rights away. hence, 'no time' for a question or answer.

hope this was more clear now, and that we can resonate ;-)