Thanks, I haven’t really followed the details of this debate enough to have a meaningful opinion. I’m sure nostr:nprofile1qqs0w2xeumnsfq6cuuynpaw2vjcfwacdnzwvmp59flnp3mdfez3czpsprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumr0wpczuum0vd5kzmp0ksxxx2 has answered this charge already. I just haven’t seen a direct answer.

I understand it’s very easy to get “Triggered” especially once a discussion has already devolved into personal attacks and appeals to emotion. I’m confident the best Bitcoiners can stay above all that.

After reading Jamesons article on nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpzfmhxue69uhkummnw3ezucn4d9kxgtcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsk233ah it brings up some important context regarding Luke’s history with core, security practices, incentives, beliefs, etc. related to the debate and decision making by node runners.

I have seen no evidence that Luke or Jameson are bad actors. Just men who are trying to do what they think is right for bitcoin.

I appreciated the article as an informational piece for my continued understanding of the debate and the people involved, hopefully leading to some kind of consensus and peace around the issues.