I think it would help if the devs explained the incentives here. All I hear is that the opreturn limit doesn’t matter. Why does removing it matter then? There’s already a discount for jamming stuff into witness data so what is the incentive to change that behavior? Logically it seems like if the fee structure isn’t changed then people will continue the status quo. I haven’t heard anyone address this. Also wouldn’t Citrea’s use of opreturn be extremely limited? All the purported use cases I hear about seem to be edge cases. And I find it condescending to hear him suggest that knots node runners may not control any bitcoin. I guess only Saylor’s node matters then?